Quasi-randomized controlled trial shows time-restricted eating and exercise enhance quality of life, indicating significant benefits over exercise alone.
Background: Menopause is often accompanied by menopausal symptoms and reduced quality of life. Studies on the combined effects of time-restricted eating and exercise in this population are lacking. This approach may provide additive preventive benefits by aligning nutritional timing with exercise to improve health and well-being in menopausal women. We aimed to assess whether a combined intervention is more effective than exercise alone in reducing menopausal symptoms and improving quality of life. Methods: This study examined the effects of a time-restricted eating protocol (16:8) combined with a resistance and endurance circuit training program in menopausal women. Symptoms were assessed using the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS), and quality of life was evaluated with the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL). Participants (n = 54) were quasi-randomly assigned to a combination group (exercise + time-restricted eating; n = 24) or an exercise group (exercise only; n = 30), with allocation influenced by participant preference. Results: The reduction in the total MRS score, as well as in the psychological and somatic MRS subdomains, was significantly greater in the combination group than in the exercise group (p = 0.008, p = 0.009, p = 0.007, respectively). No significant difference was observed in the urogenital domain. For MENQOL, post-intervention scores in the physical and psychosocial subdomains were significantly lower in the combination group compared with the exercise group (p = 0.013, p = 0.002, respectively), while no significant differences were found in the vasomotor and sexual subdomains. Conclusions: These findings suggest that integrating time-restricted eating with exercise results in greater alleviation of menopausal symptoms and improvements in quality of life compared to exercise alone in menopausal women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jóźwiak et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: