Cross-sectional evaluation shows high sensitivity and specificity of Bioneer kit for HIV viral load measuring, suggesting effective screening tool.
The Bioneer AccuPower®HIV-1 Quantitative renewed the LoD from 38 IU/mL to 33 IU/mL. Performance evaluation of the kit has not been carried out in Indonesia since the alteration, as it is expected that the new kit will have improved sensitivity. This study is a cross-sectional evaluation of the correlation, sensitivity, and specificity of the Bioneer-AccuPower HIV Quantitative RT-PCR Kit compared to the Roche-Cobas 4800 System HIV-1. We obtained venous EDTA plasma from 211 HIV patients tested in the Clinical Pathology Laboratory of Dharmais Hospital, Indonesia. Subject werw 71 high-viral-load samples (>1000 copies/mL), 60 low-viral-load samples (<1000 copies/mL), and 80 undetectable-viral-load samples (<14.2 copies/mL/<24.42 IU/mL). Exclusion criteria were samples under the limit of quantification of each instrument (Roche-Cobas®4800 20 copies/mL (34.4 IU/mL); Bioneer-AccuPower 69.4 copies/mL (49.97 IU/mL)). Ethical Declaration released by Dharmais Hospital Ethical Committee No.DP.04.03/11.7/0872024. The categorical contingency correlation in determining whether the HIV viral load sample was high, low, or undetectable was 0.863. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the Bioneer-AccuPower HIV Quantitative RT-PCR Kit, compared to the Roche Cobas 4800 System HIV-1, in quantifying HIV viral load were 99.15%, 96.25%, and 98.10%, respectively. Regarding the limit of quantification of each instrument, the Bioneer-AccuPower HIV Quantitative RT-PCR Kit performed well in determining HIV RNA viral loads, making it suitable for HIV screening. It exhibits a strong correlation compared to the Roche Cobas® 4800 System HIV-1. However, it required a larger study that did not limit the sample according to the limit of quantification of both instruments and sequenced the discrepancy samples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maskito et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: