Observational study finds bacterial growth in 53% of samples from mothers and 52.8% from healthcare workers, highlighting the role of surfaces in infection spread.
Background: Nosocomial infections are one of the leading causes of neonatal mortality, especially in Low and Middle-Income Countries. While maternal UTIs and ICU stays are well known risk factors, this study looks at hospital surfaces as well as the bacteria present on mothers’ and workers’ hands to identify additional sources of infection for nosocomial infections in newborns at hospitals in Yerevan, Armenia. Methods: This observational study was conducted at the Research Center of Maternal and Child Health Protection in Yerevan, Armenia, during 2020-2024. Microbial culture samples were taken from departments related to neonates as well as high traffic areas in the hospital (n=1099). Samples from healthcare workers (n=118) and mothers (n=107) were taken from palms, fingertips, and nails. All samples were appropriately cultured and data analysis included ttests, χ² tests, and logistic regression. Results: Most of the sampled surfaces were negative for microbial growth (n=1009 (84%)), but 98% of positive cultures could be accounted for by S. aureus, Enterobacter spp., and E. coli. The maternity hospital had the greatest number of positive samples (26.5%). 52.8% of samples from healthcare workers showed growth of S. aureus, Enterobacter spp., and E. Coli. 53.3% of samples from mothers’ hands showed growth, with 5% of samples also growing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The presence of artificial nails and jewelry on mothers’ hands showed a statistically significant increase in bacterial growth. Conclusion: This study highlights the need for continued microbiological surveillance and hand hygiene stewardship to understand local epidemiological trends and decrease rates of neonatal infections in Armenia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ugujyan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: