PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 22, 2025Surgeries2 citationsOpen Access

Comparative Clinical and Volumetric Outcomes of Contemporary Surgical Techniques for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

View Full Paper
RNRenat NurmukhametovVKV. A. KlimovAMAbakirov Medetbek

Key Points

  • Postoperative imaging showed a significant increase in foraminal canal volume, ranging from 29.9% to 71.8% across surgical techniques.
  • Oswestry Disability Index scores improved from 55.25 preoperatively to 18.27 at 24 months post-surgery, indicating substantial functional recovery.
  • VAS scores for back pain reduced from 6.37 to 2.1, while leg pain scores decreased from 6.85 to 2.05, demonstrating effective pain management.
  • Modern surgical techniques for LFS support personalized approaches based on patient anatomy and overall segment stability.

Abstract

Background: Lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) is a prevalent degenerative condition associated with significant radicular pain and impaired quality of life. Advances in minimally invasive and fusion-based surgical techniques have introduced new strategies for decompressing the neural elements. However, comparative data correlating volumetric foraminal expansion with functional outcomes remain limited. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 256 patients treated surgically for symptomatic LFS between December 2017 and December 2023. Patients were categorized into four surgical subgroups: endoscopic decompression, anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), microsurgical decompression, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Preoperative and postoperative assessments included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to calculate foraminal volume and standardized clinical scales: the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, and SF-36 health-related quality-of-life scores. Statistical significance was determined using p-values, and inter-observer agreement was evaluated via κ-statistics. Results: Postoperative imaging demonstrated a significant increase in foraminal canal volume across all surgical groups: endoscopy (29.9%), ALIF (71.8%), microsurgery (48.06%), and TLIF (67.0%). ODI scores improved from a preoperative mean of 55.25 to 18.27 at 24 months post-surgery (p < 0.001). VAS scores for back pain decreased from 6.37 to 2.1 (p < 0.001), while leg pain scores declined from 6.85 to 2.05 (p < 0.001). Functional improvement reached or exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold in over 66% of patients. Conclusions: Modern surgical strategies for LFS, particularly fusion-based techniques, yield significant volumetric decompression and durable clinical improvement. Volumetric gain in the foraminal canal is closely associated with pain reduction and enhanced functional outcomes. These findings support a tailored surgical approach based on anatomical pathology and segmental stability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nurmukhametov et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f83321d24b29c969481f5bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries6040091
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Volume-Based Stratification of Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis: A Single-Center Cohort Integrating MRI/CT Morphometrics with Stepwise Interventional, Minimally Invasive and Decompression–Stabilization Surgery2026
  2. 2Impact of “Asymptomatic,” Radiographic Foraminal Stenosis on Lumbar Spine Surgery Outcomes: A Systematic Review2026
  3. 3Impact of Extended Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy on Postoperative Surgical Outcomes: Is Greater Decompression Beneficial?2025
  4. 4Microendoscopic Posterior Decompression for L5–S1 Foraminal and Extraforaminal Lesions: A Comparative Study of Herniation Versus Stenosis2026
  5. 5COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF RADIOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES FOLLOWING TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION IN LUMBAR CANAL STENOSIS PATIENTS2024