Field assessment reveals hydrologic capacities in urban gray, green, and blue infrastructures, suggesting improved ecosystem services.
Sustainable and resilient hydrologic urban ecosystem services rely on connectivity among gray, green, and blue infrastructures. We conducted a field study of post-urban landscape hydrology in inland (River Rouge) and coastal (Detroit River) catchments on the west, and east sides, respectively, of Detroit MI. Measurements of parcel (n = 36) soil hydraulics as infiltration and drainage rates, soil taxonomic data, and depth of the groundwater table were used to determine connectivity. Hydrologic data was parsed into “stoplight” categories (green, yellow, orange, red) that at once communicate con-nectivity and best uses for sustained rendering of ecosystem services from vacant par-cels. Parcels with yellow, orange, red infiltration rates, would respond to tillage, cover cropping to increase gray-green connectivity; whereas drainage rates in the orange and red categories suggest re-development. Blue-green connectivity was constrained by high variation in drainage rate, perched versus deeper saturated zones; urban drainage affecting local groundwater gradients; and relatively little groundwater data to compare against. This assessment process can serve to optimally allocate city re-sources to effectively and efficiently identify best management practices (including redevelopment) for vacant sites, and sustain ecosystem services where they are most strongly rendered as connectivity amongst gray, green, and blue water regimes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
W.D. et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: