Case-crossover analysis reveals air pollution increases mortality risk in HIV/AIDS patients, indicating the need for targeted interventions.
Abstract Background Human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) remains a major global health concern. However, the short-term effects of transportation-related air pollution on mortality from leading causes among people living with HIV/AIDS have not been well characterized. Methods A time-stratified case-crossover study was conducted using mortality records of AIDS-related deaths in Anhui Province, China, from 2015 to 2022. Daily concentrations of traffic-related pollution, including fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅), inhalable particles (PM₁₀), nitrogen dioxide (NO₂), and carbon monoxide (CO), along with meteorological data, were incorporated into conditional logistic regression models.Lagged effects and exposure-response relationships were assessed, and subgroup analyses were stratified by sex, age, marital status, and educational level. Results Among the 2,739 recorded deaths, the leading causes were neoplasms (20.6%), respiratory diseases (20.3%), and circulatory diseases (16.9%). On case days, concentrations of PM₂.₅, PM₁₀, and NO₂ were modestly elevated compared to control days. Significant associations were observed between pollutant exposure and mortality risk, with PM₂.₅, PM₁₀, and NO₂ linked to increased risk in the neoplasm and respiratory groups, and CO exposure associated with circulatory-related deaths. Dose–response curves indicated monotonic increases in risk beyond pollutant-specific thresholds. Subgroups including males, individuals under 65 years, those with lower education, and unmarried individuals were more vulnerable. Conclusions Short-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution significantly increases the risk of death from major comorbidities among HIV/AIDS patients. These findings highlight the need for targeted environmental health interventions addressing vulnerable populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ye et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: