Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative analysis explores AI's impact on vocational instruction in TLE, revealing both opportunities and challenges.
This study explores the perceptions and experiences of Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE) educators in integrating artificial intelligence (AI) tools into vocational instruction and pedagogy. Grounded in the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework and Rogers’ Innovation Diffusion Theory, the research examines the challenges and opportunities presented by AI adoption in skill-based learning within TLE curricula. Employing a qualitative phenomenological approach, data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and document analysis, with thematic analysis used to identify key insights. Findings reveal that while TLE educators acknowledge AI's potential in enhancing instructional engagement, personalized learning, and efficiency, concerns persist regarding over-reliance on technology, access limitations, and the need for professional training. The study also highlights pedagogical shifts, including the adoption of blended learning strategies, AI-assisted assessments, and new instructional approaches that balance technological integration with hands-on practice. These results underscore the need for targeted AI training programs, infrastructure development, and institutional support to optimize AI’s role in vocational education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Randulph Navasca (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: