Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article demonstrates the coherent connection between epistemological stances and methodological approaches, emphasizing critical realism in supply chain resilience research.
This article highlights the importance of ensuring coherence between the epistemological stance, the mode of reasoning, and the research methodology in scientific inquiry, particularly in the analysis of supply chain resilience. In the face of the complexity of modern logistics systems, critical realism emerges as an appropriate paradigm, as it reconciles the causal explanation of positivism with the interpretive understanding of the social sciences. Supported by abductive reasoning, this approach enables the progressive construction of knowledge through continuous interaction between theory and empirical observation. Methodologically, the use of a mixed-methods approach—combining qualitative and quantitative tools—promotes a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon under study. Altogether, this framework provides a coherent basis for examining supply chain resilience in a manner that is both rigorous and context-sensitive. Keywords: Supply chain resilience, critical realism, abductive reasoning, mixed methods. Received Date: November 05, 2024 Accepted Date: November 26, 2024 Published Date: December 01, 2024 Available Online at https://www.ijsrisjournal.com/index.php/ojsfiles/article/view/484
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moukadem et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: