Cluster randomized trial improves self-efficacy and reduces health service use in older adults, highlighting effective intervention strategies.
Background Service models employing health–social partnership is recognised as an important strategy to support ageing in place globally, but literature reported challenges in operational concerns. Objective To evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of a community-based health–social partnership programme (C-HSPP) for community-dwelling older adults. Methods This was a cluster randomised controlled hybrid type-2 design. Implementation outcomes included reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance. Self-efficacy served as the primary effectiveness measure. The 12-week C-HSPP intervention involved nurse assessments and interventions supported by social workers. Data were collected at baseline (T1), post-intervention (T2) and follow-up (T3). Results Eight older adult centres were randomised into four matched pairs (intervention: 4, control: 4), with 755 older adults assigned to intervention (n = 381) and control (n = 374) groups. Implementation evaluation revealed high programme reach amongst both providers and users, citing facilitators such as coordinated communication and structured protocols for the C-HSPP adoption. Key implementation challenges included the need for further role clarity within the interprofessional teams, varied degree of acceptability of home visits by users due to privacy concerns and logistic constraints, and the need for resource support for a health–social team to sustain the service. Significant group-time interaction effect was detected in self-efficacy at T3 (β = −0.928, P = .035), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) at both T2 (β = −0.411, P = .032) and T3 (β = −0.437, P = .032), and reduced unplanned health service use at T2 (β = 0.493, P = .015), with better outcomes found in the intervention group. Conclusion This study has provided a working framework to translate an evidence-based health–social partnership model in real-life settings, highlighting the essence of stakeholder engagement and interprofessional communication in aligning goals with service needs. Policy support for resource allocation is important to sustain the model in the community.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bayuo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: