PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 23, 2025Animals0 citationsOpen Access

Comparing Manual and Automated Spatial Tracking of Captive Spider Monkeys Using Heatmaps

View Full Paper
SLSilje Marquardsen LundFGFrej GammelgårdJNJonas B. Nielsen

Key Points

  • Automated pose estimation revealed similar results with manual tracking, enhancing oversight of activity.
  • Both methods presented a high agreement of 83–99%, demonstrating effective analysis of spider monkey behaviors.
  • Analysis using computer vision technology improved efficiency over traditional methods, reducing observer bias.
  • Findings suggest that adopting technological approaches may significantly benefit animal welfare assessments.

Abstract

Animal welfare assessments increasingly aim to quantify enclosure use and activity to support naturalistic behavior and improve Quality of Life (QoL). Traditionally, this is achieved through manual observations, which are time-consuming, subject to observer bias, and limited in temporal resolution due to short observation periods. Here, we compared manual tracking using ZooMonitor with automated pose estimation (SLEAP) in a mother–son pair of black-headed spider monkeys (Ateles fusciceps) at Aalborg Zoo. We collected manual observations on six non-consecutive days (median daily duration: 62 min, mean: 66 min, range: 52–90 min) and visualized this as spatial heatmaps. We applied pose estimation to the same video footage, tracking four body parts to generate corresponding heatmaps. Across most days, the methods showed strong agreement (overlap 83–99%, Pearson’s r = 0.93–1.00), with both highlighting core activity areas on the floor near the central climbing structures and by the door with feeding gutters. Both methods also produced comparable estimates of time spent being active, with no significant difference across days (p = 0.952). Our results demonstrate that computer vision technology can provide a reliable and scalable tool for monitoring enclosure use and activity, enhancing the efficiency and consistency of zoo-based welfare assessments while reducing reliance on labor-intensive manual observations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lund et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f9f86eb2c35e10cc4e3c91https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15203056
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparing Manual and Automated Spatial Tracking of Captive Spider Monkeys Using Heatmaps2025
  2. 2Automated Activity Tracking and Space Use Monitoring of Captive Jaguars with Machine Learning2026
  3. 3Continuous Audio‐Visual Sensor Monitoring Is More Effective Than Human Observers for Detecting Moor Macaques2026
  4. 4Assessing Welfare in Ex Situ Lowland Tapirs Through Activity Patterns and Machine Learning2026
  5. 5A Real-time Multi-Subject Three Dimensional Pose Tracking System for Analyzing Social Behaviors of Non-human Primates2024