Cyanobacterial blooms have been increasingly detected in estuaries and freshwater tidal rivers. To enhance detailed monitoring, an efficient approach to detecting algal blooms through remote sensing is needed to focus more detailed monitoring focused on cyanobacteria. In this study, we compared different remote sensing processing methods to determine an efficient approach to mapping chlorophyll-a. Using a subset of paired chlorophyll-a observations with Sentinel-2 imagery (2015–2022), with sites located in the Chesapeake Bay and Indian River selected along gradients of salinity, turbidity, and trophic status, we compared the combined performance of two different atmospheric processing methods (Acolite, Polymer) and a suite of empirical (band ratio, spectral shape indices) and machine learning algorithms for chlorophyll-a prediction. Acolite outperformed Polymer, resulting in 176 observation points, compared to 106 observation points from Polymer, and a greater range in chlorophyll-a values (0–74 μg/L from Acolite compared to 0–36 μg/L from Polymer), although Polymer showed more responsiveness at lower chlorophyll-a levels. Two algorithms performed best in predicting chlorophyll-a, as well as trophic state and HABs risk classes: the machine learning mixture density network (MDN) approach and the one band-ratio approach (Mishra).
Wolters et al. (Tue,) studied this question.