Aerosol jet printing reveals process parameters affect microstructure quality, indicating machine learning can enhance printability control.
Aerosol Jet Printing (AJP) is a high-resolution additive manufacturing technique applied for two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) microstructures. Typical inks refer to metal solutions, but also conductive polymers, such as poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS), have been widely printed by AJP. However, optimising the AJP process remains challenging due to the non-linear, geometry-dependent effects of parameters including carrier gas flow, sheath gas flow, and platen temperature. This study introduces a physics-informed machine learning (ML) framework for predicting print quality and selecting process parameters. To our knowledge, this is the first unified, data-driven comparison of 2D lines and 3D high-aspect-ratio (HAR) pillars with PEDOT:PSS inks, revealing how process physics shift from single-layer deposition to layer-by-layer growth. Datasets were expanded with virtual sample generation and physics-based feature engineering. Five ML models, namely Random Forest, Gaussian Process Regression, Support Vector Machines, Generalised Additive Models, and Neural Networks, were trained and tuned with nested cross-validation and Bayesian optimisation. The best-performing models achieved high predictive accuracy (R² > 0.9 for 2D; R² ≈0.7 for 3D). The framework shows that 3D AJP operates within a significantly narrower process window, with carrier gas flow requiring more than four times tighter control than in 2D AJP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: