Cross-sectional survey reveals Filipino orthopedic surgeons favor hamstring grafts and single-bundle techniques in ACL reconstruction, indicating a need for localized guidelines.
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a crucial procedure for restoring knee stability and functionality, especially in active individuals. While various surgical techniques and graft options are available, preferences among surgeons vary based on regional factors, patient demographics and institutional resources. This study aimed to explore the current practices and preferences of Filipino orthopedic surgeons in ACL reconstruction. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among fellowship-trained Filipino orthopedic surgeons. Data were collected via structured questionnaires focusing on demographics, preoperative protocols, surgical techniques, graft selection and postoperative practices. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis were used to summarize and identify trends. Results: A total of 68 surgeons participated in the study. The majority (91.2%) preferred hamstring tendon grafts and single-bundle reconstruction techniques. Most respondents opted for anteromedial portal femoral tunnel creation and button fixation for the femoral tunnel, while interference screws were commonly used for tibial tunnel fixation. Immediate weight-bearing post-surgery was allowed by 94.1% of respondents, with varying timelines for returning to sports activities. Younger surgeons were more likely to adopt augmentation techniques and clear patients for earlier return to activity. Conclusion: The study highlights prevailing trends in ACL reconstruction practices among Filipino orthopedic surgeons, emphasizing the preference for hamstring grafts and single-bundle techniques. Regional limitations, such as the unavailability of allografts, significantly influence these choices. These findings underscore the need for localized guidelines and further research to standardize care and optimize patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mendoza et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: