Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Large language models (LLMs) suffer from hallucinations—confidently generating false information when uncertain. Here we demonstrate that hallucinations stem primarily from the constraint that models must always select a token from a fixed vocabulary, with no mechanism to express uncertainty. We propose and test a simple solution: we add a single ABSTAIN token to the vocabulary and train models to predict it using corruption augmentation—a scalable data augmentation technique where corrupted inputs are mapped back to the abstain token. In a simple feedforward network tasked with single-token prediction, this approach eliminated hallucinations on unseen data (hallucination rate 95% down to 0%) while maintaining perfect accuracy on known examples. The same principle also scaled to a real question-answering (QA) model: a distilled BERT, fine-tuned on SQuAD abstained on 95% of nonsense questions at the optimal corruption level without suffering a catastrophic reduction in accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baris Kanber (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: