Prospective analysis identified pharmacogenetic variants affecting chemotherapy outcomes in gastrointestinal cancer patients, suggesting improved treatment efficacy and safety.
Background/Objectives: Pharmacogenetic variability plays a crucial role in determining both the efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy for gastrointestinal cancers. However, data on allele frequencies and their clinical relevance in Russian populations remain scarce. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study of 412 patients with gastrointestinal malignancies between 2020 and 2023. Pharmacogenetic testing was performed prior to the initiation of chemotherapy using real-time allele-specific PCR and microarray hybridization technology. Polymorphisms in the DPYD, UGT1A1, CYP2C8, CYP3A5, GSTP1, ERCC1, XPC, CDA, MTHFR, TYMS, and SLC31A1 genes were analyzed. Results: The frequency of most variants was consistent with those reported in European populations, reflecting the ethnic proximity of the studied cohort. Several clinically relevant variants were identified: DPYD rs2297595 occurred more frequently than in European cohorts, and UGT1A1 rs8175347 was observed at a higher prevalence, underscoring the potential risk of irinotecan-related neutropenia and diarrhea. CYP2C8 rs10509681 was present at frequencies comparable to European populations and is associated with an increased risk of taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy. Other markers (GSTP1, ERCC1, CDA, SLC31A1, MTHFR, TYMS) demonstrated variable associations with chemotherapy efficacy and toxicity, consistent with findings from previous international studies. Conclusions: This study provides the first comprehensive description of pharmacogenetic polymorphisms in a Russian cohort of patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Our findings confirm the clinical importance of DPYD and UGT1A1 testing and highlight additional variants of potential interest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fedorinov et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: