Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review highlights automated analysis and validation of iris images with neural networks, suggesting improved biometric data handling.
The article presents a reviewmethodological framework for the automated analysis of iris images using neural network models and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques. The reproducible pipeline components are described: data sources and imaging requirements; preprocessing and segmentation of iris/pupil (exclusion of noniris regions, unwrapping, normalization); selection of architectures (pretrained CNNs, CNN+ViT hybrids) and training on limited datasets. The role of XAI as a quality component is highlighted: GradCAM/ GradCAM++, Integrated Gradients, SHAP, EnsembleCAM; quantitative validation (IoU/pointinggame, Deletion/Insertion, Infidelity) and probability calibration (ECE, Brier). Clinical scenarios are discussed (localized iris pathologies; to a limited extent – systemic correlations), as well as limitations of evidence and privacy requirements for biometric data. A «practical minimum» for prototyping and external validation is formulated, with an emphasis on stratified domainspecific reporting. Future directions are outlined: standardized datasets, open benchmarks, multicenter validation, and domain shift monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yarushev et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: