This article demonstrates how the GENAIS symbology can enhance transparency and academic integrity in scholarly contexts, suggesting international collaboration for standardisation.
The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has created new opportunities for teaching, learning, and research, but it has also amplified concerns about academic integrity and the transparency of AI involvement. Despite recent guidelines, there remains no internationally recognised visual standard for disclosing AI use in scholarly contexts. This article introduces the GENAIS symbology system—a conceptual framework for transparent, standardised marking of AI involvement in academic work. Drawing on current literature and a critical review of the GENAIS proposal, the article demonstrates its potential to enhance transparency, support detection, and futureproof academic practices. Recommendations for pilot studies, international collaboration, and pathways to formal standardisation are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steve Glassey (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: