Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Narrative review finds topical JAK inhibitors may improve safety in patients with localized inflammatory skin diseases, suggesting a potential alternative to systemic JAK inhibitors.
Janus Kinase Inhibitors (JAKi) represent a novel class of drugs for the treatment of chronic inflammatory skin diseases. Topical JAKi (t-JAKi) offer targeted therapy at potentially reduced systemic side effects and improved long-term safety compared to systemic JAKi (s-JAKi). This narrative review assesses the pharmacokinetics and safety profile of currently available t-JAKi, ruxolitinib and delgocitinib, with a comparative analysis to s-JAKi. Pharmacokinetic data show that topical ruxolitinib achieves effective dermal concentrations, with minimal systemic exposure. Clinical trials consistently report low rates of adverse events, primarily application-site reactions, while systemic events such as upper respiratory tract infections occur at rates comparable to placebo. Data on delgocitinib similarly indicate negligible systemic absorption and a favorable safety profile. Taken together, these findings suggest that t-JAKi may represent safer alternatives to s-JAKi for selected patients with localized inflammatory skin diseases, particularly those with comorbidities or heightened systemic risk. Long-term studies and real-world evidence are needed to confirm sustained safety and guide their optimal integration into clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boell et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: