The MEniscal TeaR Outcome (METRO) study

Aims The aim of this study was to describe the baseline characteristics of patients with a meniscal tear and explore associations with 12-month outcomes. Methods This prospective, national multicentre cohort study recruited patients aged 18 to 55 years presenting to secondary care with MRI-confirmed meniscal tears. All tear types and mechanisms of injury were included. Osteoarthritis severity was assessed using the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS). Outcomes at 12 months were measured using the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS4). Multivariable regression analysis assessed associations between 17 baseline factors (including age, tear type, mechanical symptoms, arthritis severity, and undergoing surgery) and 12-month outcomes. A total of 201 patients were recruited across eight sites, with a mean age of 43.2 years (SD 9.7). Results WORMS analysis indicated no or early-stage osteoarthritis. Stepwise logistic regression showed that higher baseline WOMET and KOOS4 scores, as well as undergoing surgery, were significantly associated with improved 12-month outcomes (p < 0.001). Surgery led to a mean 18-point improvement in both WOMET and KOOS4 scores (out of 100). Mechanical symptoms were not significantly associated with outcomes (p > 0.05). Post hoc analysis revealed that patients who underwent surgery were significantly younger (p = 0.011), with no other baseline differences between groups. Conclusion In patients with MRI-confirmed meniscal tears, surgical intervention and higher baseline outcome scores were associated with significantly better 12-month patient-reported outcomes. Mechanical symptoms did not predict outcome, suggesting that they should not be exclusively used to guide treatment decisions. Further exploration of these findings is required through randomized trials using similar inclusion criteria to this study. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2025;107-B(11):1189–1195.