PulseTrendingJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeTrendingJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 3, 2025Journal of Law Politic and HumanitiesOpen Access

Analysis Of The Judge's Ruling Regarding The Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI) (Decision Study Number: 305/Pdt.G/BANI/2014/PN Jkt.Utr)

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

TATata Eliestiana Dyah AJJJamaludin Jamaludin

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Normative legal research reveals implications of deception claims and freedom of contract in BANI arbitration outcome.

Key Points

  • The judge's ruling emphasized freedom of contract and revealed issues of deception in case resolution.
  • Judicial reasoning was guided by Civil Code principles, impacting the outcome of BANI decision 305/Pdt.G/BANI/2014.
  • Normative legal research employed statutory and conceptual approaches to analyze the case's legal foundations.
  • The implications of the ruling highlight potential challenges in arbitration agreements and judicial oversight.

Cite This Study

A et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6907f1ac0328c9fb7920b5fbhttps://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2509
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share