Observational analysis reveals barotropic circulation patterns in the Arctic Ocean, indicating significant vertical velocities in specific regions.
As the number of in situ measurements of ocean currents in the central Arctic Ocean remains very limited, much of our understanding of the Arctic Ocean circulation is based on idealized wind‐driven models. In this paper, we make use of the latest available hydrography and Mean Dynamic Topography to study the Arctic Ocean time‐mean circulation. Key concepts such as to what degree the flow is steered by bathymetry, equivalent barotropic, and consistent in direction along isobaths are evaluated. Comparing along‐ and cross‐isobath velocities, we find that while the former generally has a larger magnitude, they are locally comparable in many regions. In these regions, the estimated cross‐isobath velocities imply vertical velocities that can be orders of magnitude larger than typical surface Ekman pumping velocities. Even so, we find that the surface and bottom flow is generally well‐aligned along closed ambient potential vorticity contours spanning local basins as well as the entire Arctic Ocean. In some regions of the central Arctic Ocean, where the hydrographic coverage is relatively sparse, bathymetric alignment is stronger in the surface. Despite this, our results suggest that the circulation is essentially equivalent barotropic and even barotropic in some regions. At some locations where water enters or exits the deep Arctic Basin, along‐isobath flow reversals are observed at the surface as well as the bottom. Finally, the direction and magnitude of the bottom flow in regions of anti‐cyclonic surface circulation are found to be sensitive to the choice of data set.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kallmyr et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: