Analysis compares machine learning and deep learning techniques for PM2.5 and PM10 forecasting, indicating feature engineering impacts accuracy.
Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) pollution remains a significant environmental concern in Indonesia. This study employed the SISANAPAS web platform to compare machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms for PM2.5 and PM10 forecasting. Using 3-hourly data from Cibeureum (January-October 2024), which underwent comprehensive pre-processing (K-Nearest Neighbors imputation, Z-score outlier removal, Min-Max scaling, feature engineering), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), Random Forest, and XGBoost models were evaluated. XGBoost Regression provided the most accurate forecasts, with an R² of 0.85, RMSE of 5.05 µg/m³, and MAE of 3.19 µg/m³ for PM2.5, and an R² of 0.85, RMSE of 9.71 µg/m³, and MAE of 6.55 µg/m³ for PM10. These results, significantly outperforming LSTM and GRU, highlight XGBoost's potential for reliable air quality prediction and demonstrate SISANAPAS as a valuable tool for environmental data analysis, crucial for informing public health and environmental policies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prasetyo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: