This article reviews the history of non-government bills with a notwithstanding clause in Canada, suggesting gaps remain in the literature.
This article will not address the mechanics of notwithstanding clause, the arguments for and against its use, or how courts should approach its invocation — all of this has received extensive academic attention. Rather, the purpose of this article is to fill a narrow gap in the literature regarding the history of federal non-government bills introduced with a notwithstanding clause based on publicly available information. It will do so in three parts: first, it will briefly present some relevant parliamentary vocabulary and concepts; second, it will review the individual bills at issue, sorted by theme; and finally, it will conclude with brief comments and directions for future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charlie Feldman (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: