Automated deep learning approaches classify liver images, achieving 99.1% accuracy and suggesting improved detection strategies for liver cancer.
Background Liver cancer, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, emphasizing the need for accurate and early detection methods. Objective This study introduces LiverCompactNet, an advanced deep learning framework for the early detection and classification of liver cancer. Methods LiverCompactNet classifies liver images into three categories: benign, malignant, and normal. The dataset comprised 5,000 liver images (1,500 benign, 1,500 malignant, and 2,000 normal), divided into training (3,500), validation (750), and test (750) subsets. Data preprocessing involved normalization using MinMaxScaler, class balancing. Additionally, exploratory Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed only on derived tabular features (e.g., intensity histograms, categorical encodings) to visualize variance structure, but PCA was not directly applied to raw imaging data or CNN training inputs. Results LiverCompactNet demonstrated outstanding performance with an overall accuracy of 99.1%, malignant detection sensitivity of 98.3%, specificity of 99.4%, precision of 97.6%, and an AUC-ROC score of 0.995. Training performance steadily improved, with accuracy rising from 90% in epoch 1 to 99% by epoch 20, and validation accuracy increasing from 88% to 98.5%. Loss analysis revealed effective learning, with training loss approaching zero and validation loss remaining marginally higher. Final evaluations confirmed near-perfect classification metrics: precision at 97.6%, sensitivity at 96.8%, specificity at 98.9%, and an AUC-ROC score of 0.993. Conclusion LiverCompactNet offers highly accurate, reliable, and early detection capabilities for liver cancer, paving the way for improved medical image analysis and clinical decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dai et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: