Investigation uncovers shear-thinning oil worsens fingering and reduces displacement efficiency in porous media, suggesting optimization of CO2 flooding strategies.
During the process of CO2 displacing shear-thinning oil, the occurrence of fingering is a key factor contributing to a reduction in both displacement and sequestration efficiency. Existing studies typically use the average viscosity to calculate the viscosity ratio M for shear-thinning oil, overlooking the non-uniform viscosity distribution resulting from uneven shear stress. Consequently, a phase diagram based on M fails to accurately capture the underlying mechanism influencing fingering. We investigate the influence of shear-thinning on fingering patterns by analyzing viscosity heterogeneity during immiscible CO2 flooding in porous media. The results showed the following: (1) An increase in zero-shear viscosity (μ0) resulted in a greater viscosity difference between the two phases, which intensified interface instability, and the power-law index (n) diminished the shear-thinning effect, promoted fingering formation, and significantly reduced displacement efficiency, with a maximum reduction of 28.6% observed in this study. (2) Shear-thinning oil was more prone to capillary fingering compared to Newtonian oil under the same capillary number Ca and viscosity ratio M. (3) Intense pressure fluctuations at the displacement front combined with non-uniform viscosity distribution exacerbate interfacial instability and make shear-thinning oil more prone to capillary fingering. This study provides guidance for optimizing displacement strategies for shear-thinning fluids and advancing the practical implementation of CO2 flooding technology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: