Experiment demonstrates increases in adventitious root number and length in black locust under continuous light, suggesting enhanced hormonal regulation through RpCOP1.
Continuous light is a crucial environmental signal, yet its precise role in adventitious rooting in woody plants, particularly concerning the function of the classical light-signaling repressor CONSTITUTIVE PHOTOMORPHOGENIC 1, remains a significant open question. This study investigated how continuous light regulates adventitious root formation in Robinia pseudoacacia L. (black locust) through RpCOP1-mediated mechanisms. Black locust tissue culture plantlets were analyzed through anatomical observation, physiological measurements, hormone profiling, transcriptome sequencing with time-ordered gene co-expression network analysis, and heterologous overexpression validation in poplar. Continuous light treatment advanced rooting by 2 days, increasing adventitious root number by 86.03 % and root length by 110.76 %. The pro-adventitious rooting effect was associated with physiological reprogramming, wherein continuous light reduced photosynthetic efficiency while promoting soluble sugar accumulation at the stem base. Time-ordered gene co-expression network analysis identified RpCOP1 as a key upstream hub whose expression is induced by continuous light. Upregulation of RpCOP1 coincided with systemic hormonal reprogramming, highlighted by 60.72 % increase in auxin. Functional validation via heterologous overexpression of RpCOP1 in poplar supported this positive regulatory role. Compared with wild-type, transgenic lines under continuous light exhibited 33.33 % increase in adventitious root number and 75.85 % increase in root length, demonstrating a photoperiod-dependent effect, with rooting performance ordering continuous light > normal light > continuous dark. These findings support a context-dependent model where RpCOP1 function exhibits either repressive or activating roles depending on light environment and tissue type.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: