Retrospective study finds neoadjuvant pembrolizumab improves clinical outcomes in hypopharyngeal carcinoma, suggesting favorable efficacy.
Objective This retrospective study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab combined with paclitaxel and cisplatin (ICI+TP) in the treatment of locally advanced oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPHSCC). Methods Patients with locally advanced OPHSCC who received ICI+TP, cetuximab with paclitaxel-cisplatin (CET+TP), or paclitaxel-cisplatin alone (TP) were reviewed. Radiographic and pathological response rates, transoral surgery rates, and survival outcomes were assessed. Results A total of 83 patients were enrolled in this study, with 23 subjected to ICI+TP, 31 to CET+TP, and 29 to TP. Compared with TP, ICI+TP yielded superior clinical outcomes: a higher objective response rate (ORR) (91.3% vs. 55.2%, p <0.05), greater transoral surgery feasibility (91.3% vs. 34.5%, p <0.05), lower tracheostomy incidence (26.1% vs. 79.3%, p <0.05). Among hypopharyngeal carcinoma patients, ICI+TP achieved an ORR of 100%, outperforming both CET+TP (62.5%) and TP (51.9%). The transoral surgery rate reached 89.5% (vs. 29.6% with TP, p <0.05) while tracheostomy requirements were reduced (21.1% vs. 85.2%, p <0.05). Notably, ICI+TP produced significantly higher primary tumor pathological complete response rates than CET+TP (57.9% vs. 20.8%, p <0.05). Median follow-up was 10 months for ICI+TP, 13 months for CET+TP, and 24 months for TP. Neither progression-free nor overall survival showed significant improvement among the three groups. Conclusion In locally advanced OPHSCC, neoadjuvant pembrolizumab combined with paclitaxel and cisplatin showed a higher ORR and increased transoral surgery rates while preserving laryngeal function, with no increase in severe treatment-related adverse events, demonstrating favorable efficacy and safety profiles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: