Model shows resource allocation impacts preferences in decision making, indicating equilibrium allocations do not optimize outcomes.
We propose a model of individual decision making that separates a central executive system (“Ego”) from a sub-self with its own preferences (“Cold”) and an impulsive sub-self with different preferences (“Hot”). Ego cares only about the payoffs of the other two sub-selves and allocates available resources between them. For standard neoclassical preferences over joint consumption, we show that in subgame perfect Nash equilibrium, Ego will choose a resource allocation that enables neither Hot nor Cold to attain their most preferred affordable bundle. Moreover, the two sub-selves each choose a more extreme and specialized bundle than they would choose if they unilaterally controlled all available resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: