Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Scoping review evaluates crack propagation in CAD/CAM materials and direct composites, suggesting short fiber-reinforced composites may improve resistance.
Objective: To compare the fracture toughness of CAD/CAM resin-based restorative materials and direct composite resins. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was conducted in July 2025 across PubMed/MEDLINE, EBSCO, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and grey literature. Eligible studies were only in vitro investigations evaluating fracture toughness of direct composite resins and CAD/CAM hybrid materials. Study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. A systematic review and meta-analysis were not performed due to methodological heterogeneity, and findings were synthesized qualitatively. Results: Fifty-two studies met the inclusion criteria, including 16 assessing CAD/CAM restorative materials. Considerable variability in fracture toughness values was observed, even within the same material type. Most studies were judged to present a medium risk of bias. Short fiber-reinforced composites exhibited higher fracture toughness, whereas other CAD/CAM resin-based materials showed values comparable to direct composites. Conclusions: Current evidence does not confirm superior fracture toughness of CAD/CAM resin-based materials compared with direct composites. Short fiber-reinforced composites appear to offer improved resistance to crack propagation. Standardized testing protocols are needed to enable more reliable comparisons.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomaidis et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: