The GEP-PM model enhances evapotranspiration predictions in sand dunes and meadows, indicating improved water balance dynamics.
Study region: This study was conducted at the Agula Eco-hydrological Experimental Station, located in the southeastern part of the Horqin Sandy Land, Tongliao City, Inner Mongolia, North China (43°18’48’’–43°21’2’’N, 122°32’30’’–122°41’00’’E). Study focus: To enhance ET prediction, this study modifies the FAO56 Penman-Monteith model by integrating Gene Expression Programming (GEP), developing the GEP-PM model. The model improves ET estimation by recombining the radiation and aerodynamic terms and optimizing parameters for different surface types. The study focuses on two contrasting land surfaces—sand dunes and meadows—where the model is calibrated using a cost function minimization approach to capture dynamic ET variations at a 30-minute time scale. The model’s performance was evaluated using Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), the coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE). New hydrological insights for the region: Results demonstrate that the GEP-PM model provides accurate ET predictions across both sand dunes and meadows, with R² values ranging from 0.71 to 0.83, RMSE from 0.04 to 0.07 mm/h, MAE from 0.02 to 0.05 mm/h, and NSE from 0.72 to 0.86. ET rates were observed between 0 and 0.8 mm/day on meadows and 0 to 0.6 mm/day on sand dunes, highlighting the model’s adaptability to heterogeneous land surface conditions. These findings provide valuable insights into semi-arid water balance dynamics, supporting sustainable water resource management, precision irrigation planning, and hydrological modeling in dryland ecosystems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jia et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: