Analysis shows improved performance in detecting fractures with AI using anatomical alignment in medical images, suggesting significant advances for clinical applications.
An Incomplete Atypical femoral fracture is subtle and requires early diagnosis. However, artificial intelligence models for these fractures often fail in real-world clinical settings due to the “domain shift” problem, where performance degrades when applied to new data sources. This study proposes a data-centric approach to overcome this problem. We introduce an anatomy-based four-step preprocessing pipeline to normalize femoral X-ray images. This pipeline consists of (1) semantic segmentation of the femur, (2) skeletonization and centroid extraction using RANSAC, (3) rotational alignment to the vertical direction, and (4) cropping a normalized region of interest (ROI). We evaluate the effectiveness of this pipeline across various one-stage (YOLO) and two-stage (Faster R-CNN) object detection models. On the source domain data, the proposed alignment pipeline significantly improves the performance of the YOLO model, with YOLOv10n achieving the best performance of 0.6472 at mAP@50–95. More importantly, in zero-shot evaluation on a completely new domain, standing AP X-ray, the model trained on aligned data exhibited strong generalization performance, while the existing models completely failed (mAP = 0), YOLOv10s, which applied the proposed method, achieved 0.4616 at mAP@50–95. The first-stage detector showed more consistent performance gains from the alignment technique than the second-stage detector. Normalizing medical images based on inherent anatomical consistency is a highly effective and efficient strategy for achieving domain generalization. This data-driven paradigm, which simplifies the input to AI, can create clinically applicable, robust models without increasing the complexity of the model architecture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwon et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: