Thermo-mechanical modeling reveals enhanced strength and reduced spring-back in Al/CF/PEEK components, suggesting optimal layering strategies.
Spring‐back is a significant forming defect in high‐performance Al/CF/PEEK hybrid structures (made of aluminum alloy and CF/PEEK). The strength enhancement of hybrid components is also urgently needed. This study establishes a thermo‐mechanical coupling model and finite element model for Al/CF/PEEK hybrid V‐shaped components, taking into account the crystallization shrinkage deformation of CF/PEEK as well as the anisotropy of its thermal expansion coefficient and thermal conductivity during the forming–cooling–crystallization–spring‐back process. The effects of various layup structures (multi‐layer CF/PEEK plies and multi‐layer aluminum alloy plies) and specimen length on the strength, stress–strain distribution during forming, and spring‐back of hybrid V‐shaped components were studied. Model validation was achieved through profile/temperature/spring‐back/relative crystallinity comparisons between simulations and experiments. The study reveals that shorter specimen dimensions prevent the formation of end bending zone D on the component, effectively reducing both stress and shear strain levels, thereby facilitating easier forming processes. The spring‐back increases with the number of Al sheets, decreases with the number of CF/PEEK prepreg layers, and reduces with decreasing specimen size. The bending strength increases with the number of both Al sheets and prepreg layers. While multiple Al sheets are more effective in enhancing the bending strength of hybrid V‐shaped components, they adversely affect spring‐back reduction. Increasing CF/PEEK layers can significantly improve the interlaminar strength of the V‐parts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: