PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 19, 2025Sustainability14 citationsOpen Access

Applications of Geographic Information Systems in Ecological Impact Assessment: A Methods Landscape, Practical Bottlenecks, and Future Pathways

View Full Paper
JDJun DongXLXiongWei LiangBDBaolong Du

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the applications of Geographic Information Systems in ecological impact assessments and address related challenges.
  • Review of GIS applications in Environmental Impact Assessment
  • Analysis of case studies showcasing GIS and remote sensing synergies
  • Discussion of operational workflows for EIA applications
  • Identification of persistent challenges in GIS data use
  • GIS enhances decision-making in Environmental Impact Assessments
  • Identified challenges include data quality, standardization, and interoperability
  • Proposal for minimum geospatial dataset with clear metadata standards and IoT-GIS pipelines

Abstract

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are central to spatial evidence in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). In this review, GIS is used in a broad, integrative sense to refer to an ecosystem of geospatial technologies—such as remote sensing (RS) and GPS—where GIS serves as the core platform for managing, analyzing, and communicating spatial data throughout the EIA process. GIS plays a crucial role at each stage of EIA, from baseline data collection to spatial analysis, ecological sensitivity mapping, impact prediction, scenario simulation, and landscape connectivity assessment. These capabilities support alternatives analysis, risk communication, and decision-making in EIA. This paper synthesizes thematic evidence and presents case studies to illustrate the synergies between GIS, remote sensing, GeoAI, and multisource data fusion. It highlights operational workflows and key deliverables for EIA applications, including urban expansion, transport corridors, and protected-area management. We identify persistent challenges in data quality and standardization, interoperability, model uncertainty, and policy gaps. To address them, we propose a minimum geospatial dataset with clear metadata standards, interpretable GeoAI paired with formal sensitivity analysis, IoT–GIS pipelines for real-time monitoring and adaptive management, and the systematic inclusion of cumulative effects and climate scenarios. By linking GIS methods to typical decision points and reporting standards in EIA, this review clarifies where GIS adds value, how to quantify and communicate uncertainty, and how to align analytical outputs with regulatory requirements and stakeholder expectations. The study offers a practical framework and implementation checklist for standardized, transparent, and reproducible EIA processes, contributing to evidence-based ecological governance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dong et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6924f095c0ce034ddc350cf0https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210358
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper