The study demonstrates improved gender-based violence detection in speech, suggesting machine unlearning may enhance mental health screening accuracy.
Gender-based violence is a pervasive social and public health issue that severely impacts women’s mental health, often leading to conditions such as anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and substance abuse. Identifying the combination of these various mental health conditions could then point to someone who is a victim of gender-based violence. While speech-based artificial intelligence tools appear as a promising solution for mental health screening, their performance often deteriorates when encountering speech from previously unseen speakers, a sign that speaker traits may be confounding factors. This study introduces a speaker-agnostic approach to detecting the gender-based violence victim condition—defined as self-identified survivors who exhibit pre-clinical PTSD symptom levels—from speech, aiming to develop robust artificial intelligence models capable of generalizing across speakers. By employing domain-adversarial training, we reduce the influence of speaker identity on model predictions, and we achieve a 26.95% relative reduction in speaker identification accuracy while improving gender-based violence victim condition classification accuracy by 6.37% (relative). These results suggest that our models effectively capture paralinguistic biomarkers linked to the gender-based violence victim condition, rather than speaker-specific traits. Additionally, the model’s predictions show moderate correlation with pre-clinical post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, supporting the relevance of speech as a non-invasive tool for mental health monitoring. This work lays the foundation for ethical, privacy-preserving artificial intelligence systems to support clinical screening of gender-based violence survivors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reyner-Fuentes et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: