Systematic literature review highlights stakeholder involvement and implementation barriers in destination management.
This study aims to identify and critically compare multi-stakeholder frameworks and collaborative approaches for sustainable destination development. A comprehensive literature review was carried out, examining the most relevant frameworks published between 2014 and mid-2025. This study compares frameworks and collaborative approaches grounded in a real-life context, examining their operational mechanisms, foundational principles, and the adaptive perspectives tailored to specific destinations. The research questions were developed using the SPIDER tool, and the literature review was conducted using sources from various databases. Seventy-eight articles were included and typologically classified as applied, conceptual, and empirical. To deepen comparison, six focal cases were assessed in a five-criterion matrix. Three typical destination settings were presented and describe how frameworks are configured across contexts. The findings reflect a maturity scale, with empirical cases presenting a more comprehensive overview in relation to the criteria of the matrix. The discussion takes place through the identification of barriers and challenges of frameworks’ implementation and the introduction of two practical design levers, as an interpretive contribution, that are identified as mechanisms that go beyond the framework for upgrading the quality of implementation. The study contributes to the broader discussion on sustainable development and offers useful recommendations for future research in destination management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panagiotopoulou et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: