Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Novel algorithm shows improved performance in multi-objective optimization problems, indicating better convergence and diversity management.
In recent years, many constrained multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (CMOEAs) have primarily emphasized feasible solutions, overlooking the useful information contained in infeasible ones. This tendency effectively prioritizes feasibility over objective quality, often leading to the premature removal of infeasible solutions with strong convergence or diversity, thereby reducing performance on constrained multi-objective optimization problems (CMOPs) with complex or irregular feasible regions. To overcome these limitations, this paper introduces a weak constraint–Pareto dominance relation that integrates feasibility with objective performance, thereby preventing the premature elimination of infeasible solutions that may offer strong convergence or diversity. Moreover, an angle distance-based diversity maintenance strategy is proposed to preserve population diversity while ensuring solution feasibility. By combining these two mechanisms, we design the CMOEA-WA algorithm. Extensive experiments on benchmark and real-world problems confirm that the proposed method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art CMOEAs, achieving a more effective balance among feasibility, convergence, and diversity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: