Experimental evaluation shows an F1 score of 79.35% with a dual retrieval system, indicating improved accuracy in welding queries.
This paper pioneers the use of the symmetrical Hybrid-RAG strategy in the ship welding process domain, addressing the problems of fragmented, unstructured knowledge storage, as well as the limitations of traditional Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), particularly high retrieval noise and low accuracy when answering complex procedural queries. This study proposes an intelligent three-stage symmetric “Generate–Retrieve–Generate” framework for the ship welding process (SWP-Chat), supported by dual retrieval engines: a Neo4j knowledge graph for symbolic reasoning and a vector database for semantic retrieval. Unlike approaches that rely solely on LLM-based process planning, SWP-Chat uses the LLM to generate a logical form, then executes Cypher queries on Neo4j, enabling transparent traceability, precise entity–relation constraints, and deterministic retrieval. Meanwhile, the vector channel supplements unstructured or contextual welding information to enhance semantic coverage. To further improve efficiency, principal component analysis (PCA) was employed for vector dimensionality reduction, reducing average retrieval latency by 31% while retaining more than 95% variance. In addition, an explainable structural–confidence fusion formula integrates evidence from both engines to produce auditable and trustworthy industrial responses. Experimental evaluation demonstrates that the framework achieves an F1 score of 79.35%, greatly surpassing typical RAG systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ye et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: