Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This framework demonstrates effective e-waste management in learning institutions, suggesting collaborative solutions to reduce carbon emissions.
Technology is increasingly used in schools to teach, study, and organise. Technology use has increased e-waste. As "electronic waste" or "e-waste," old laptops, desktops, projectors, and other devices contain hazardous components that can harm the environment if discarded improperly. This study examines the challenges learning institutions face in handling e-waste without compromising efficiency, including the need to stay current, insufficient funds to repair equipment, and a lack of knowledge on how to dispose of it. To overcome these obstacles, this article proposed a shared solution: a sustainable collaboration to manage electronic waste. e-waste data collection and analysis are the foundation of this framework. Of 452 electrical products, 32.1% were older than 5 years and 34.1% needed repair or replacement. On-site recycling offers a 90% material recovery rate and a 10,000 yearly profit after operational expenses, making it superior than external recycling (210,000 vs. 7,000). Real-time monitoring, automated reporting, and decision-support tools make the suggested concept reproducible for sustainable e-waste management in learning institutions. The suggested framework would reduce carbon emissions by 5-7 metric tonnes and salvage 15 tonnes of valuable materials annually. It also estimates the cost of delivering electronic waste to merchants and compares it to the cost of constructing an e-waste recycling centre in a learning institution. By working together, educational institutions may lessen their environmental effect and be responsible technology guardians for future generations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ganesh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: