Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article demonstrates how larp enhances moral sentimentalism in political discourse, suggesting new avenues for research and engagement.
In this article, I claim that moral sentimentalism is a good approach for political philosophers wanting to engage in public political philosophy. I propose live action roleplay (larp) as a method to maximise the potential of this. In the first section, I present the urgency for public political philosophy through Jonathan Floyd’s recent article. I claim that Floyd’s presentation of public political philosophy is complemented by thinking of certain topics in political discourse as wicked problems. I argue that moral sentimentalism is an excellent fit for public political philosophy because of its goal of eliciting empathy. I present methods in political philosophy that have appropriate immersive properties, but claim that larp takes this a step further. In the final section, I look at why this is and suggest larp as a method for moral sentimentalists to engage in public political philosophy research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simon Stevens (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: