Incubation study quantifies CO2 emissions from topsoil and subsoil in peat soils, indicating temperature impacts and implications for greenhouse gas inventories.
Drainage of peatlands for agriculture reverses their natural carbon sink function and leads to substantial CO 2 emissions. However, the relative contributions of topsoil and subsoil layers to these emissions remain poorly quantified, limiting the accuracy of CO 2 flux models in national greenhouse gas inventories. In this incubation study, we quantified CO 2 , N 2 O and CH 4 fluxes from intact peat cores collected at 5–13 cm (topsoil) and 25–33 cm (subsoil) depth from arable and permanent grassland sites at a cultivated Danish bog. Fluxes were measured at five temperatures (2.5–23.4 °C) and across four soil water tensions ranging from full rewetting to pF 2.5. Topsoil consistently showed higher CO 2 fluxes than subsoil, averaging a threefold difference. Temperature exerted a strong exponential control on emissions, with Q 10 values ranging from 1.7 to 4.0 depending on depth, site and moisture status. Rewetting reduced CO 2 fluxes from the topsoil at elevated temperatures but had little effect on the subsoil, which showed weaker temperature sensitivity and lower microbial activity. These findings align with asymptotic depth–flux relationships indicating that topsoil dominates the short-term response of CO 2 fluxes to rewetting. Fluxes of N 2 O were negligible except in rewetted arable subsoil, where high fluxes suggested incomplete denitrification under micro-oxic and acidic conditions. Fluxes of CH 4 were also negligible, indicating insufficiently anaerobic conditions for methanogenesis during the short-term incubation. Our results emphasise the importance of incorporating depth-specific CO 2 dynamics in emission models and indicate that rewetting strategies must target the near-surface peat to optimise mitigation outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kandel et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: