Theoretical study reveals optimal strategies in the Werewolf Game, suggesting modeling frameworks enhance decision-making.
In this paper, we investigate the optimal strategies in the Werewolf Game—a widely played strategic social deduction game involving two opposing factions—from a game-theoretic perspective. We consider two scenarios: the game without a prophet and the game with a prophet. In the scenario without a prophet, we propose an enhanced strategy called “random strategy+” that significantly improves the werewolf group’s winning probability over conventional random strategies. In the scenario with a prophet, we reformulate the game as an extensive-form Bayesian game under a specific constraint, and derive the prophet’s optimal strategy that induces a Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium (PBE). This study provides a rigorous analytical framework for modeling the Werewolf Game and offers broader insights into strategic decision-making under asymmetric and incomplete information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi-Tong Wang (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: