Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals the Court of Justice of the European Union strengthens accountability, indicating limits on administrative powers granted to EU bodies.
The interpretation of the principle of separation of powers in the EU has developed a distinct character through the principle of institutional balance. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has played a central role in assessing and overseeing this principle. This article examines how the EU’s understanding of the separation of powers has shaped the functioning of its administrative branch. Specifically, it focuses on how the CJEU has applied the principle of institutional balance through the so-called non-delegation doctrine, which restricts the delegation of powers to EU administrative bodies. It argues that the CJEU’s interpretation has affected the theoretical understanding of administrative powers, ultimately hindering the development of a robust framework to ensure the accountability of discretionary powers exercised by administrative bodies not explicitly outlined in the EU treaties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marta Simoncini (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: