Analysis highlights connections between ellipsoidal designs and the PTE problem, suggesting new solutions and theoretical advancements.
The notion of ellipsoidal design was first introduced by Pandey (Ramanujan J, 58(4):1245–1257, 2022) as a full generalization of spherical designs on the unit circle S¹ S 1 . In this paper, we elucidate the advantages of examining the connections between ellipsoidal design and the two-dimensional Prouhet–Tarry–Escott problem, say \,PTE\,₂ PTE 2 , originally introduced by Alpers and Tijdeman (J Number Theory, 123(2):403–412, 2007) as a natural generalization of the classical one-dimensional PTE problem ( \,PTE\,₁ PTE 1 ). We first provide a combinatorial criterion for the construction of solutions of the \,PTE\,₂ PTE 2 from a pair of ellipsoidal designs. We also give an arithmetic proof of the Stroud-type bound for ellipsoidal designs and then establish a classification theorem for designs with equality. Such a classification result is closely related to an open question on the existence of rational spherical 4-designs on S¹ S 1 , discussed in Cui et al. (Adv Math, 352:541–571, 2019). As far as the authors know, a solution found by Alpers and Tijdeman is the first and the only known parametric ideal solution of degree 5 for the \,PTE\,₂ PTE 2 . Moreover, as one of our main theorems, we prove that the Alpers–Tijdeman solution is equivalent to a certain two-dimensional extension of the famous Borwein solution for the \,PTE\,₁ PTE 1 . As a by-product of this theorem, we discover a family of ellipsoidal 5-designs among the Alpers–Tijdeman solution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MATSUMURA et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: