Observational analysis reveals interpretability of a Symbolic Regression model for AOp, suggesting improvement for risk assessments in urban blasting.
Accurate prediction of blast-induced air overpressure (AOp) is vital for environmental management and safety in mining and construction. Traditional empirical models are simple but fail to capture complex meteorological effects, while accurate black-box machine learning models lack interpretability, creating a significant dilemma for practical engineering. This study resolves this by applying explainable AI (XAI) to develop a transparent, “white-box” model that explicitly quantifies how meteorological parameters, wind speed, direction, and air temperature influence AOp. Using a dataset from an urban excavation site, the methodology involved comparing a standard USBM empirical model and a Multivariate Non-linear Regression (MNLR) model against a Symbolic Regression (SR) model implemented with the PySR tool. The SR model demonstrated superior performance on an independent test set, achieving an R2 of 0.771, outperforming both the USBM (R2 = 0.665) and MNLR (R2 = 0.698) models, with accuracy rivaling a previous “black-box” neural network. The key innovation is SR’s ability to autonomously generate an explicit, interpretable equation, revealing complex, non-linear relationships between AOp and meteorological factors. This provides a significant engineering contribution: a trustworthy, transparent tool that enables engineers to perform reliable, meteorologically informed risk assessments for safer blasting operations in sensitive environments like urban areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdulkadir Karadogan (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: