Wearable technology reveals sleep duration and impacts of BMI in adults with congenital heart disease, suggesting sleep management is crucial.
Background: Adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) are living longer but face increasing comorbidities. Sleep is a key health determinant, yet objective data in CHD remain limited. This study compared sleep characteristics of adults with CHD and controls using wearable technology and a Health Application Programming Interface (API). Methods: A total of 175 CHD patients (33.1 ± 10.3 years, 49.2% women) and 52 controls (34.4 ± 12.4 years, 40.4% women) completed seven continuous days of wrist-worn Garmin Vivosmart® 5 during routine follow-up at the TUM Klinikum Deutsches Herzzentrum. Sleep duration, phases, Sleep Scores, and weekday-weekend differences were analyzed, and multivariate models examined clinical and demographic predictors. Results: Total sleep duration and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep did not differ between groups. CHD patients had more deep sleep (83 ± 19 vs. 75 ± 16 min, p = 0.004) but lower Sleep Scores (74 ± 9 vs. 77 ± 9, p = 0.041). Within CHDs, deep sleep was higher on weekends than on weekdays (p = 0.033). Multivariate analyses showed no overall group effect, but age (p = 0.016), sex (p = 0.013), and body mass index (BMI; p < 0.001) significantly predicted sleep outcomes. Regression analyses in CHDs revealed female sex associated with longer REM sleep (p < 0.001), while higher BMI consistently predicted poorer outcomes. Disease severity was linked to lower Sleep Scores. Conclusions: Sleep in CHDs is broadly comparable to controls, but BMI, sex, and disease severity significantly shape outcomes. The additional variability between weekends and weekdays and a higher risk of sleep-disordered breathing, according to the literature, underscores that sleep is an underestimated target for prevention and clinical care in CHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schöneburg et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: