This framework improves integrated production management efficiency through sensitivity analysis and modeling decision-making.
Defect-rate uncertainty creates cascading operational challenges in multi-stage production, often driving inefficiency and misallocation of labor, materials, and capacity. To confront this, we develop a multi-stage Production Integrated Decision (MsPID) framework that unifies quality inspection and shop-floor decision-making within a single computational model. The framework couples a two-stage sampling inspection policy—used to statistically learn and control defect-rate uncertainty via estimation and rejection rules—with a multi-process, multi-part production decision model. Optimization is carried out with an Improved Grey Wolf Optimizer (IGWO) enhanced with Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) for uniformly diverse initialization; an evolutionary factor mechanism that blends simulated binary crossover (SBX) among three leadership-guided parents (Alpha, Beta, Delta) to strengthen global exploration in early iterations and focus exploitation later; and a greedy, mutation-assisted opposition learning step applied to the lowest-performing quartile of the population to effect leader-informed local refinement and accept only fitness-improving moves. Experiments show the method identifies minimum-cost policies across six single-stage benchmark cases and yields a total profit of 43,800 units in a representative multi-stage scenario, demonstrating strong performance in uncertain environments. Sensitivity analysis further clarifies how recommended decisions adapt to shifts in estimated defect rates, finished product prices, and swap/changeover losses. These results highlight how bio-inspired intelligence can enable adaptive, efficient, and resilient integrated production management at scale.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: