Co-simulation approach reveals aerodynamic characteristics and performance of high-speed trains under crosswind, indicating advantages in efficiency.
The interaction between the airflow and train influences the aerodynamic characteristics and dynamic performance of high-speed trains. This study focused on the fluid-solid coupling effect of airflow and HST, and proposed a co-simulation (CS) approach between computational fluid dynamics and multi-body dynamics. Firstly, the aerodynamic model was developed by employing overset mesh technology and the finite volume method, and the detailed train-track coupled dynamic model was established. Then the User Data Protocol was adopted to build data communication channels. Moreover, the proposed CS method was validated by comparison with a reported field test result. Finally, a case study of the HST exiting a tunnel subjected to crosswind was conducted to compare differences between CS and offline simulation (OS) methods. In terms of the presented case, the changing trends of aerodynamic forces and car-body displacements calculated by the two methods were similar. Differences mainly lie in aerodynamic moments and transient wheel-rail impacts. Maximum pitching and yawing moments on the head vehicle in the two methods differ by 21.1 kN∙m and 29.6 kN∙m, respectively. And wheel-rail impacts caused by sudden changes in aerodynamic loads are significantly severer in CS. Wheel-rail safety indices obtained by CS are slightly greater than those by OS. This research proposes a CS method for aerodynamic characteristics and dynamic performance of the HST in complex scenarios, which has superiority in computational efficiency and stability
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: