Analysis shows durability impacts of manufactured sands on concrete under sulfate exposure, suggesting performance differences between types.
With the rapid development of infrastructure and the need to protect natural ecosystems, manufactured sand is used to replace river sand in concretes. To compare the deterioration patterns of concretes made with different sands, C50 specimens using basalt (C50X), tuff (C50N), and granite (C50H) manufactured sands and river sand (C50T) were prepared, then tested outdoors by full burial in a sulfate saline soil and indoors by accelerated freeze–thaw in a sulfate solution. The outdoor experiments indicate that C50X deteriorated the slowest, whereas the resistance to mass loss ranking was: C50X > C50H > C50N > C50T. In the indoor freeze–thaw experiments, C50X also performed best, retaining 51% relative dynamic modulus of elasticity (RDME) after 450 cycles. X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy showed that C50T was weakened by abundant MgSO4·7H2O crystals, while C50X formed a denser matrix that limits salt-crystallization expansion. Moreover, a GM(1,1)-Markov model was developed to forecast long-term durability. For C50X, the model predicted an estimated service life of 68 months in the outdoor environment, at which point it is projected to reach the 5% mass loss failure threshold. Separately, it forecasted that the RDME would remain above 41% after 450 indoor freeze–thaw cycles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: