Quantitative analysis reveals mediation effects of structure and strategy on organizational performance in healthcare, indicating strategies for managers and policymakers.
This research analyzes the relationships among environmental factors, organizational structure, strategic orientation, and organizational performance within the Romanian medical system, addressing a theoretical gap in this context. A quantitative approach was applied, analyzing data from 502 employees in the Romanian medical sector. The study used a dual framework, integrating gestalt theory and mediation to examine the environment–structure–strategy–performance relationship. Two-stage cluster analysis, one-way analysis of variance, and partial least squares structural equation modeling tested direct and mediated effects among the variables. From a gestalt perspective, five distinct clusters demonstrated the interplay between environment, structure, and strategy. Romanian healthcare organizations align their structural elements and strategic decisions coherently and distinctly, considering contextual constraints, with implications for several performance dimensions, including patient satisfaction, financial stability, innovation, and internal process improvement. From a mediation perspective, both direct and mediated relationships indicate that organizational structure and strategic orientation positively affect organizational performance and suppress the negative contextual effects. This study contributes theoretically by extending contingency and gestalt theories to the Romanian healthcare context, showing that contextual fit, rather than structural uniformity, determines performance variation. Practically, the findings guide healthcare managers and policymakers in attenuating contextual shocks and improving organizational performance through strategic alignment and flexible structural design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ștefan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: