This article reveals Mulchenko's key role in writing Naukometriya, suggesting systematic under-recognition of women's scientific contributions.
This article revisits the early history of Soviet scientometrics, examining the role of Zinaida Mulchenko in writing Naukometriya – the foundational book in this field. While Vasily V. Nalimov is widely regarded as the sole author of the book, the influence of Mulchenko remains mostly unknown. We argue that her involvement in writing Naukometriya was also significant. To support this claim, we first reveal the key aspects of her biography obtained through the archival research and informants’ testimonies. Then, we compare the content of Naukometriya with Mulchenko’s Ph.D. dissertation, i.e. the first doctoral thesis in scientometrics defended in the Soviet Union, underlying the structural, systematic and content overlaps that question the commonly held view of sole authorship. Such analysis is further accompanied with the track-record of Nalimov-Mulchenko co-authorship reconstruction preceding the years of Naukometriya publication. Finally, we propose that Mulchenko’s diminished positionality as the co-author of the book can be understood through the lens of the Matilda Effect – a systematic under-recognition of women’s contributions to science. Drawing from multi-level analysis, we reconstruct her role in writing the book and identify the reasons that eventually led to Mulchenko’s erasure from the history of Soviet scientometrics. Peer Review https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer-review/10.1162/QSS.a.397
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kislenko et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: